On 16.10.22 14:24, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 10/16/22 19:21, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> On 10/16/22 03:59, Phillip Lougher wrote: >>> >>> Which identified the "squashfs: support reading fragments in readahead call" >>> patch. BTW, Phillip, sorry for specifying the wrong culprit in an earlier mail. > Also, since this regression is also found on linux-6.0.y stable branch, > don't forget to Cc stable list. FWIW, that's afaics not needed (and actually slightly confusing I'd say). That is only important when the problem was introduced in a stable release to make the stable team aware of it, as then they might be willing to revert the culprit if the problem is not present in mainline. But this problem was introduced in the 6.0 mainline cycle and thus needs to be fixed there first. Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight. P.P.S.: #regzbot introduced: b09a7a036d2035b14636c
