On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:49:10AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/10/22 00:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.73 release. > > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:03:19 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Building h8300:allnoconfig ... failed > -------------- > Error log: > In file included from include/linux/fs.h:6, > from include/linux/huge_mm.h:8, > from include/linux/mm.h:727, > from include/linux/pid_namespace.h:7, > from include/linux/ptrace.h:10, > from arch/h8300/kernel/asm-offsets.c:15: > include/linux/wait_bit.h: In function 'wait_on_bit': > include/linux/wait_bit.h:74:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'test_bit_acquire'; did you mean 'test_bit_le'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 74 | if (!test_bit_acquire(bit, word)) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | test_bit_le > > This affects h8300 builds in all branches all the way back to v4.9.y. > It also affects release candidates for various other architectures > in v4.9.y..v5.10.y. In v4.9.y.queue, for example, I see 56 build > failures out of 164 builds; most if not all of those can be attributed > to problems with test_bit_acquire() - either due to a missing or due > to a bad backport. > > I can only hope that fix for the the problem that required the > test_bit_acquire() backport is worth the trouble it causes. Not yet, no. I'm dropping them all. thanks, greg k-h
