Greg, > On Sep 30, 2022, at 7:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:11:19AM -0400, Slade Watkins wrote: >> Hey Greg, >> >>> On Sep 30, 2022, at 1:59 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:37:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:26:25PM -0400, Jerry Ling wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> It has been reported by multiple users across a handful of distros that >>>>> there seems to be regression on Framework laptop (which presumably is not >>>>> that special in terms of mobo and display) >>>>> >>>>> Ref: https://community.frame.work/t/psa-dont-upgrade-to-linux-kernel-5-19-12-arch1-1-on-arch-linux-gen-11-model/23171 >>>> >>>> Can anyone do a 'git bisect' to find the offending commit? >>> >>> Also, this works for me on a gen 12 framework laptop: >>> $ uname -a >>> Linux frame 5.19.12 #68 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Sep 30 07:02:33 CEST 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >>> so there's something odd with the older hardware? >>> >>> greg k-h >> >> Could be. Running git bisect for 5.19.11 and 5.19.12 (as suggested by the linked forum thread) returned nothing on gen 11 for me. >> >> This is very odd, > > So 5.19.11 works for you, but 5.19.12 does not? > > Or is it just the arch packaged kernel that does not work for you? > Oh, no no no. I was saying there weren't any issues. I myself haven’t had any issues on gen 11 framework. I tested the arch-packaged versions, as well as the kernels directly from source. Both didn’t have anything to report from bisect. (Odd? Yeah.) I’m really sorry for the confusion, -srw
