On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, at 9:19 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>
>>Ah, so mean this just got incorrectly identified as a dependency
>>by a script, not that you were actually considering the backport
>>of the context changes, right?
>
> My workflow is to have the script attempt to identify and cherry-pick
> all dependencies, marking them as such, and then I manually go over the
> result and decide whether we really need the patches it picked or not.
Ok, got it.
> So in theory yes, at some point this was considered for backport, but
> should have been dropped during the review phase.
It looks like it's still in stable-rc/linux-5.10.y, can we drop it now?
Arnd
