On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 04:09:16PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> I was not aware of cpu_feature_enabled() and it makes perfect sense to
> use it here.
It is no difference what the callers use - we simply want to unify the
interfaces and not have boot_cpu* and cpu_feature_* and so on. One is
enough and we want to use cpu_feature_enabled() everywhere possible.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
