On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:53:23AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 20-09-22, 19:10, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > Hi Vinoud,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 6:35 PM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Dario,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 04:10:19PM +0200, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > > > Driver registration fails on SOC imx8mn as its supplier, the clock
> > > > control module, is probed later than subsys initcall level. This driver
> > > > uses platform_driver_probe which is not compatible with deferred probing
> > > > and won't be probed again later if probe function fails due to clock not
> > > > being available at that time.
> > > >
> > > > This patch replaces the use of platform_driver_probe with
> > > > platform_driver_register which will allow probing the driver later again
> > > > when the clock control module will be available.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: a580b8c5429a ("dmaengine: mxs-dma: add dma support for i.MX23/28")
> > > > Co-developed-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > How I see it v3 of this patch is perfectly fine and should be taken
> > > instead of this one. I just commented that to v3.
> > >
> > > Not sure if Vinod would take v3, or if you should resend v3 as v6
> > > instead. If you do, you can add my Acked-by.
> > >
> > > Vinod, please let us know what you prefer.
> >
> > Could you please let me know how to proceed? This patch has been pending for
> > a while and it's a real shame as the change is minimal and fixes a
> > real issue that is
> > still present in the mainline and stable kernels.
>
> Ooops, Somehow this seems to have really slipped. Sorry I owe you an
> apology for this
>
> I am still not sure of this patch yet, lets get it right and merged
> quickly. I will send my review later today
I just realized that unlike what I said v3 of this patch is still wrong
as it leaves the __init annotation on mxs_dma_init() which is called
from (non __init) mxs_dma_probe(). v3 probably doesn't give a section
mismatch warning because mxs_dma_init() is inlined.
Really v2 is the one we should take which is at:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220523132247.1429321-1-dario.binacchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
