Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> 于2022年9月19日周一 09:08写道：
>
> >On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:46:15AM +0800, yong w wrote:
> >> Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 于2022年9月13日周二 21:54?道：
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 09:09:47PM +0800, yong wrote:
> >> > > Hello,
> >> > > This patch is required to be patched in linux-5.4.y and linux-4.19.y.
> >> >
> >> > What is "this patch"? There is no context here :(
> >> >
> >> Sorry, I forgot to quote the original patch. the patch is as follows
> >>
> >> f27ce0e page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast
> >>
> >> > > In addition to that, the following two patches are somewhat related:
> >> > >
> >> > > 3334a45 mm/page_alloc: use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx
> >> > > 9282012 page_alloc: fix invalid watermark check on a negative value
> >> >
> >> > In what way? What should be done here by us?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I think these two patches should also be merged.
> >>
> >> The classzone_idx parameter is used in the zone_watermark_fast
> >> functionzone, and 3334a45 use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx.
> >> "9282012 page_alloc: fix invalid watermark check on a negative
> >> value" fix f27ce0e introduced issues
> >
> >Ok, I need an ack by all the developers involved in those commits, as
> >well as the subsystem maintainer so that I know it's ok to take them.
> >
> >Can you provide a series of backported and tested patches so that they
> >are easy to review?
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
>
> Hello I didn't know my Act is needed to merge it.
>
> Acked-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I don't understand well why the commit f27ce0e has dependency on 3334a45, though.
>
Hello, the classzone_idx is used in the zone_watermark_fast function, and
there will be conflicts when f27ce0e is merged.
Looking back, the following two patches adjust the classzone_idx parameter.
3334a45 mm/page_alloc: use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx
97a225e mm/page_alloc: integrate classzone_idx and high_zoneidx
and 3334a45 is the key modification.
Actually, I think 3334a45 can be merged or not.
Thanks.
