Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: 8250: Let drivers request full 16550A feature probing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19. 09. 22, 10:18, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022, Jiri Slaby wrote:

--- linux-macro.orig/include/linux/serial_core.h
+++ linux-macro/include/linux/serial_core.h
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ struct uart_icount {
   	__u32	buf_overrun;
   };
   -typedef unsigned int __bitwise upf_t;
+typedef __u64 __bitwise upf_t;

Why __u64 and not u64?

  For consistency as there's `__u32' used elsewhere in this file.  It's not
clear to me what our rules WRT the use of `s*'/`u*' vs `__s*'/`__u*' are.
I don't think we have it mentioned under Documentation/.  Please clarify
if you know and I can update the change accordingly.

The rule is, AFAICT, use __u*/__s* in user (uapi) headers. Everywhere else, use u*/s*.

@@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ struct uart_port {
   #define UPF_FIXED_PORT		((__force upf_t) (1 << 29))
   #define UPF_DEAD		((__force upf_t) (1 << 30))
   #define UPF_IOREMAP		((__force upf_t) (1 << 31))
+#define UPF_FULL_PROBE		((__force upf_t) (1ULL << 32))

This looks like a perfect time to switch them all to BIT_ULL().

  Good point, I keep forgetting about that macro.  I'll keep this part
unchanged for the purpose of backporting and add 3/3 to switch all the
macros over.

OK.

thanks,
--
js
suse labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux