On 9/16/22 4:52 PM, Russ Weight wrote:
There is an error check following the allocation of flash_buf that returns
without freeing flash_buf. It makes more sense to do the error check
before the allocation and the reordering eliminates the memory leak.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 154afa5c31cd ("fpga: m10bmc-sec: expose max10 flash update count")
Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c b/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c
index 526c8cdd1474..79d48852825e 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c
@@ -148,10 +148,6 @@ static ssize_t flash_count_show(struct device *dev,
stride = regmap_get_reg_stride(sec->m10bmc->regmap);
num_bits = FLASH_COUNT_SIZE * 8;
- flash_buf = kmalloc(FLASH_COUNT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!flash_buf)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
if (FLASH_COUNT_SIZE % stride) {
dev_err(sec->dev,
"FLASH_COUNT_SIZE (0x%x) not aligned to stride (0x%x)\n",
@@ -160,6 +156,10 @@ static ssize_t flash_count_show(struct device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ flash_buf = kmalloc(FLASH_COUNT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!flash_buf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
ret = regmap_bulk_read(sec->m10bmc->regmap, STAGING_FLASH_COUNT,
flash_buf, FLASH_COUNT_SIZE / stride);
if (ret) {
