Hello Greg, On So, Sep 11, 2022 at 07:41:02 +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Eugeniu Rosca wrote: [..] > > Your proposal [*] seems to resolve the issue for me. > > > > Any chance to get a stable patch, to which I will gladly provide > > the Reviewed-by/Tested-by signatures? > > > > > > > > > > NeilBrown > > > > > > > > [*] diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c > > index e7d55d63d4f1..7f9b94acf597 100644 > > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c > > @@ -1525,9 +1525,9 @@ static void xprt_destroy(struct rpc_xprt *xprt) > > * is cleared. We use ->transport_lock to ensure the mod_timer() > > * can only run *before* del_time_sync(), never after. > > */ > > - spin_lock(&xprt->transport_lock); > > + spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock); > > del_timer_sync(&xprt->timer); > > - spin_unlock(&xprt->transport_lock); > > + spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock); > > > > /* > > * Destroy sockets etc from the system workqueue so they can > > > > Can you just turn this into a proper patch that we can apply to the > needed stable tree(s)? It has been kindly provided by Neil Brown in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/166293725263.30452.1720462103844620549@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Best Regards, Eugeniu Rosca
