The patch titled Subject: kernel/printk/printk.c: fix faulty logic in the case of recursive printk has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is fix-faulty-logic-in-the-case-of-recursive-printk.patch This patch should soon appear at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fix-faulty-logic-in-the-case-of-recursive-printk.patch and later at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/fix-faulty-logic-in-the-case-of-recursive-printk.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Patrick Palka <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: kernel/printk/printk.c: fix faulty logic in the case of recursive printk We shouldn't set text_len in the code path that detects printk recursion because text_len corresponds to the length of the string inside textbuf. A few lines down from the line text_len = strlen(recursion_msg); is the line text_len += vscnprintf(text + text_len, ...); So if printk detects recursion, it sets text_len to 29 (the length of recursion_msg) and logs an error. Then the message supplied by the caller of printk is stored inside textbuf but offset by 29 bytes. This means that the output of the recursive call to printk will contain 29 bytes of garbage in front of it. This defect is caused by commit 458df9fd ("printk: remove separate printk_sched buffers and use printk buf instead") which turned the line text_len = vscnprintf(text, ...); into text_len += vscnprintf(text + text_len, ...); To fix this, this patch avoids setting text_len when logging the printk recursion error. This patch also marks unlikely() the branch leading up to this code. Fixes: 458df9fd4815b478 ("printk: remove separate printk_sched buffers and use printk buf instead") Signed-off-by: Patrick Palka <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/printk/printk.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff -puN kernel/printk/printk.c~fix-faulty-logic-in-the-case-of-recursive-printk kernel/printk/printk.c --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c~fix-faulty-logic-in-the-case-of-recursive-printk +++ a/kernel/printk/printk.c @@ -1665,15 +1665,15 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock); logbuf_cpu = this_cpu; - if (recursion_bug) { + if (unlikely(recursion_bug)) { static const char recursion_msg[] = "BUG: recent printk recursion!"; recursion_bug = 0; - text_len = strlen(recursion_msg); /* emit KERN_CRIT message */ printed_len += log_store(0, 2, LOG_PREFIX|LOG_NEWLINE, 0, - NULL, 0, recursion_msg, text_len); + NULL, 0, recursion_msg, + strlen(recursion_msg)); } /* _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx are fix-faulty-logic-in-the-case-of-recursive-printk.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html