On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 12:44 +0300, jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:50:33AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote: > > On Sat, 2022-09-03 at 13:26 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > static int ksgxd(void *p) > > > > { > > > > + unsigned long left_dirty; > > > > + > > > > set_freezable(); > > > > > > > > /* > > > > * Sanitize pages in order to recover from kexec(). The 2nd pass is > > > > * required for SECS pages, whose child pages blocked EREMOVE. > > > > */ > > > > - __sgx_sanitize_pages(&sgx_dirty_page_list); > > > > - __sgx_sanitize_pages(&sgx_dirty_page_list); > > > > + left_dirty = __sgx_sanitize_pages(&sgx_dirty_page_list); > > > > + pr_debug("%ld unsanitized pages\n", left_dirty); > > > %lu > > > > > > > I assume the intention is to print out the unsanitized SECS pages, but what is > > the value of printing it? To me it doesn't provide any useful information, even > > for debug. > > How do you measure "useful"? > > If for some reason there were unsanitized pages, I would at least > want to know where it ended on the first value. Using pr_debug() means it's for debugging the driver, but to me it doesn't help on debugging the driver, so it is not useful. Anyway, I will stop argue here. -- Thanks, -Kai