Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/86] 5.10.140-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

On 29/08/22 05:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.140 release.
There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:57:37 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.140-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.140-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 10c6bbc07890234ed728ef39924dcdd3bd211e15
* git describe: v5.10.138-89-g10c6bbc07890
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.138-89-g10c6bbc07890

## No test regressions (compared to v5.10.139)

## No metric regressions (compared to v5.10.139)

## No test fixes (compared to v5.10.139)

## No metric fixes (compared to v5.10.139)

## Test result summary
total: 117997, pass: 106134, fail: 761, skip: 10810, xfail: 292

## Build Summary
* arc: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 590 total, 590 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 110 total, 107 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 92 total, 89 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 90 total, 90 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 102 total, 102 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 54 total, 54 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 97 total, 94 passed, 3 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux