From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 6bae8ceb90ba76cdba39496db936164fa672b9be ]
While reading rs->interval and rs->burst, they can be changed
concurrently via sysctl (e.g. net_ratelimit_state). Thus, we
need to add READ_ONCE() to their readers.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/ratelimit.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/ratelimit.c b/lib/ratelimit.c
index e01a93f46f833..ce945c17980b9 100644
--- a/lib/ratelimit.c
+++ b/lib/ratelimit.c
@@ -26,10 +26,16 @@
*/
int ___ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs, const char *func)
{
+ /* Paired with WRITE_ONCE() in .proc_handler().
+ * Changing two values seperately could be inconsistent
+ * and some message could be lost. (See: net_ratelimit_state).
+ */
+ int interval = READ_ONCE(rs->interval);
+ int burst = READ_ONCE(rs->burst);
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
- if (!rs->interval)
+ if (!interval)
return 1;
/*
@@ -44,7 +50,7 @@ int ___ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs, const char *func)
if (!rs->begin)
rs->begin = jiffies;
- if (time_is_before_jiffies(rs->begin + rs->interval)) {
+ if (time_is_before_jiffies(rs->begin + interval)) {
if (rs->missed) {
if (!(rs->flags & RATELIMIT_MSG_ON_RELEASE)) {
printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING
@@ -56,7 +62,7 @@ int ___ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs, const char *func)
rs->begin = jiffies;
rs->printed = 0;
}
- if (rs->burst && rs->burst > rs->printed) {
+ if (burst && burst > rs->printed) {
rs->printed++;
ret = 1;
} else {
--
2.35.1
