On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:34:51AM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > EDID 1.4 introduced some extra flags in the range > descriptor to support min/max h/vfreq >= 255. Consult them > to correctly parse the vfreq limits. > > Note that some combinations of the flags are documented > as "reserved" (as are some other values in the descriptor) > but explicitly checking for those doesn't seem particularly > worthwile since we end up with bogus results whether we > decode them or not. > > v2: Increase the storage to u16 to make it work (Jani) > Note the "reserved" values situation (Jani) > v3: Document the EDID version number in the defines > Drop some bogus (u8) casts > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6519 > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------ > include/drm/drm_connector.h | 4 ++-- > include/drm/drm_edid.h | 5 +++++ > 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c > index 493922069c90..01ee3febb813 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c > @@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ static int vrr_range_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > if (connector->status != connector_status_connected) > return -ENODEV; > > - seq_printf(m, "Min: %u\n", (u8)connector->display_info.monitor_range.min_vfreq); > - seq_printf(m, "Max: %u\n", (u8)connector->display_info.monitor_range.max_vfreq); > + seq_printf(m, "Min: %u\n", connector->display_info.monitor_range.min_vfreq); > + seq_printf(m, "Max: %u\n", connector->display_info.monitor_range.max_vfreq); > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > index 90a5e26eafa8..4005dab6147d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > @@ -6020,12 +6020,14 @@ static void drm_parse_cea_ext(struct drm_connector *connector, > } > > static > -void get_monitor_range(const struct detailed_timing *timing, > - void *info_monitor_range) > +void get_monitor_range(const struct detailed_timing *timing, void *c) > { > - struct drm_monitor_range_info *monitor_range = info_monitor_range; > + struct detailed_mode_closure *closure = c; > + struct drm_display_info *info = &closure->connector->display_info; > + struct drm_monitor_range_info *monitor_range = &info->monitor_range; > const struct detailed_non_pixel *data = &timing->data.other_data; > const struct detailed_data_monitor_range *range = &data->data.range; > + const struct edid *edid = closure->drm_edid->edid; > > if (!is_display_descriptor(timing, EDID_DETAIL_MONITOR_RANGE)) > return; > @@ -6041,18 +6043,28 @@ void get_monitor_range(const struct detailed_timing *timing, > > monitor_range->min_vfreq = range->min_vfreq; > monitor_range->max_vfreq = range->max_vfreq; > + > + if (edid->revision >= 4) { > + if (data->pad2 & DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MIN_VFREQ) > + monitor_range->min_vfreq += 255; > + if (data->pad2 & DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MAX_VFREQ) > + monitor_range->max_vfreq += 255; Yes this makes sense. This looks like added for supporting HRR (high refresh rate) panels. Do you think we should mention that in the commit message or in the comment in the code itself? Other than that looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> Manasi > + } > } > > static void drm_get_monitor_range(struct drm_connector *connector, > const struct drm_edid *drm_edid) > { > - struct drm_display_info *info = &connector->display_info; > + const struct drm_display_info *info = &connector->display_info; > + struct detailed_mode_closure closure = { > + .connector = connector, > + .drm_edid = drm_edid, > + }; > > if (!version_greater(drm_edid, 1, 1)) > return; > > - drm_for_each_detailed_block(drm_edid, get_monitor_range, > - &info->monitor_range); > + drm_for_each_detailed_block(drm_edid, get_monitor_range, &closure); > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Supported Monitor Refresh rate range is %d Hz - %d Hz\n", > info->monitor_range.min_vfreq, > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_connector.h b/include/drm/drm_connector.h > index 248206bbd975..56aee949c6fa 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_connector.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_connector.h > @@ -319,8 +319,8 @@ enum drm_panel_orientation { > * EDID's detailed monitor range > */ > struct drm_monitor_range_info { > - u8 min_vfreq; > - u8 max_vfreq; > + u16 min_vfreq; > + u16 max_vfreq; > }; > > /** > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h > index 2181977ae683..1ed61e2b30a4 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h > @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ struct detailed_data_string { > u8 str[13]; > } __attribute__((packed)); > > +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MIN_VFREQ (1 << 0) /* 1.4 */ > +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MAX_VFREQ (1 << 1) /* 1.4 */ > +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MIN_HFREQ (1 << 2) /* 1.4 */ > +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MAX_HFREQ (1 << 3) /* 1.4 */ > + > #define DRM_EDID_DEFAULT_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x00 > #define DRM_EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG 0x01 > #define DRM_EDID_SECONDARY_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x02 > -- > 2.35.1 >
