From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 74de14fe05dd6b151d73cb0c73c8ec874cbdcde6 ]
When CONFIG_XPA is enabled, Clang warns:
arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:629:24: error: converting the result of '<<' to a boolean; did you mean '(1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT) != 0'? [-Werror,-Wint-in-bool-context]
if (cpu_has_rixi && !!_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
^
arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h:174:28: note: expanded from macro '_PAGE_NO_EXEC'
# define _PAGE_NO_EXEC (1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT)
^
arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:2568:24: error: converting the result of '<<' to a boolean; did you mean '(1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT) != 0'? [-Werror,-Wint-in-bool-context]
if (!cpu_has_rixi || !_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
^
arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h:174:28: note: expanded from macro '_PAGE_NO_EXEC'
# define _PAGE_NO_EXEC (1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT)
^
2 errors generated.
_PAGE_NO_EXEC can be '0' or '1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT' depending on the
build and runtime configuration, which is what the negation operators
are trying to convey. To silence the warning, explicitly compare against
0 so the result of the '<<' operator is not implicitly converted to a
boolean.
According to its documentation, GCC enables -Wint-in-bool-context with
-Wall but this warning is not visible when building the same
configuration with GCC. It appears GCC only warns when compiling C++,
not C, although the documentation makes no note of this:
https://godbolt.org/z/x39q3brxf
Reported-by: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c b/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c
index 547d813ead48..061dc5c97d5a 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static __maybe_unused void build_convert_pte_to_entrylo(u32 **p,
return;
}
- if (cpu_has_rixi && !!_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
+ if (cpu_has_rixi && _PAGE_NO_EXEC != 0) {
if (fill_includes_sw_bits) {
UASM_i_ROTR(p, reg, reg, ilog2(_PAGE_GLOBAL));
} else {
@@ -2568,7 +2568,7 @@ static void check_pabits(void)
unsigned long entry;
unsigned pabits, fillbits;
- if (!cpu_has_rixi || !_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
+ if (!cpu_has_rixi || _PAGE_NO_EXEC == 0) {
/*
* We'll only be making use of the fact that we can rotate bits
* into the fill if the CPU supports RIXI, so don't bother
--
2.35.1
