From: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> commit 7249921d94ff64f67b733eca0b68853a62032b3d upstream. If in perf_trace_event_init(), the perf_trace_event_open() fails, then it will call perf_trace_event_unreg() which will not only unregister the perf trace event, but will also call the put() function of the tp_event. The problem here is that the trace_event_try_get_ref() is called by the caller of perf_trace_event_init() and if perf_trace_event_init() returns a failure, it will then call trace_event_put(). But since the perf_trace_event_unreg() already called the trace_event_put() function, it triggers a WARN_ON(). WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 30309 at kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c:46 trace_event_dyn_put_ref+0x15/0x20 If perf_trace_event_reg() does not call the trace_event_try_get_ref() then the perf_trace_event_unreg() should not be calling trace_event_put(). This breaks symmetry and causes bugs like these. Pull out the trace_event_put() from perf_trace_event_unreg() and call it in the locations that perf_trace_event_unreg() is called. This not only fixes this bug, but also brings back the proper symmetry of the reg/unreg vs get/put logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1660347763.git.kjlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220816192817.43d5e17f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fixes: 1d18538e6a092 ("tracing: Have dynamic events have a ref counter") Reported-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void perf_trace_event_unreg(struc int i; if (--tp_event->perf_refcount > 0) - goto out; + return; tp_event->class->reg(tp_event, TRACE_REG_PERF_UNREGISTER, NULL); @@ -176,8 +176,6 @@ static void perf_trace_event_unreg(struc perf_trace_buf[i] = NULL; } } -out: - trace_event_put_ref(tp_event); } static int perf_trace_event_open(struct perf_event *p_event) @@ -241,6 +239,7 @@ void perf_trace_destroy(struct perf_even mutex_lock(&event_mutex); perf_trace_event_close(p_event); perf_trace_event_unreg(p_event); + trace_event_put_ref(p_event->tp_event); mutex_unlock(&event_mutex); } @@ -292,6 +291,7 @@ void perf_kprobe_destroy(struct perf_eve mutex_lock(&event_mutex); perf_trace_event_close(p_event); perf_trace_event_unreg(p_event); + trace_event_put_ref(p_event->tp_event); mutex_unlock(&event_mutex); destroy_local_trace_kprobe(p_event->tp_event); @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ void perf_uprobe_destroy(struct perf_eve mutex_lock(&event_mutex); perf_trace_event_close(p_event); perf_trace_event_unreg(p_event); + trace_event_put_ref(p_event->tp_event); mutex_unlock(&event_mutex); destroy_local_trace_uprobe(p_event->tp_event); }
