The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 3bbb7b2e9bbcd22e539e23034da753898fe3b4dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 01:52:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] apparmor: fix setting unconfined mode on a loaded profile
When loading a profile that is set to unconfined mode, that label
flag is not set when it should be. Ensure it is set so that when
used in a label the unconfined check will be applied correctly.
Fixes: 038165070aa5 ("apparmor: allow setting any profile into the unconfined state")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
index df4033db0e0f..302fecf9b197 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
@@ -750,16 +750,18 @@ static struct aa_profile *unpack_profile(struct aa_ext *e, char **ns_name)
profile->label.flags |= FLAG_HAT;
if (!unpack_u32(e, &tmp, NULL))
goto fail;
- if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_COMPLAIN || (e->version & FORCE_COMPLAIN_FLAG))
+ if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_COMPLAIN || (e->version & FORCE_COMPLAIN_FLAG)) {
profile->mode = APPARMOR_COMPLAIN;
- else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_ENFORCE)
+ } else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_ENFORCE) {
profile->mode = APPARMOR_ENFORCE;
- else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_KILL)
+ } else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_KILL) {
profile->mode = APPARMOR_KILL;
- else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_UNCONFINED)
+ } else if (tmp == PACKED_MODE_UNCONFINED) {
profile->mode = APPARMOR_UNCONFINED;
- else
+ profile->label.flags |= FLAG_UNCONFINED;
+ } else {
goto fail;
+ }
if (!unpack_u32(e, &tmp, NULL))
goto fail;
if (tmp)
