On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:13:36AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Sorry for not reporting this sooner; been out sick all week with COVID.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:46 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit ffcf9c5700e49c0aee42dcba9a12ba21338e8136 upstream.
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
> > @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ LDFLAGS_vmlinux := -pie $(call ld-option
> > ifdef CONFIG_LD_ORPHAN_WARN
> > LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --orphan-handling=warn
> > endif
> > +LDFLAGS_vmlinux += -z noexecstack
> > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_LD_IS_BFD),y)
>
> 5.10.y is missing CONFIG_LD_IS_BFD. Specifically
>
> commit 02aff8592204 ("kbuild: check the minimum linker version in Kconfig")
> which first landed in v5.12-rc1. I'd recommend simply dropping the
> `ifeq` guards; the ld-option guard will still work. Otherwise GNU BFD
> 2.39 users will observe linker warnings related to rwx-segments.
>
> Greg, do you mind dropping this patch and I'll supply a v2, or is it
> too late and I should send a patch on top?
I've fixed it up now, thanks!
greg k-h
