@@ -745,9 +747,9 @@ static void __nvmet_req_complete(struct nvmet_req
*req, u16 status)
trace_nvmet_req_complete(req);
- if (req->ns)
- nvmet_put_namespace(req->ns);
req->ops->queue_response(req);
+ if (ns)
+ nvmet_put_namespace(ns);
Why did the put change position?
I'm not exactly clear what was used-after-free here..
Hi Sagi,
Is my understanding correct that the NVMe target namespace owns the
block device `req` is associated with and hence that the namespace
reference count must only be dropped after dereferencing the `req`
pointer has finished?
This is what I found in the NVMe target code:
* nvmet_put_namespace() decreases ns->ref.
* Dropping the last ns->ref causes nvmet_destroy_namespace() to be
called. That function completes ns->disable_done.
* nvmet_ns_disable() waits on that completion and calls
nvmet_ns_dev_disable().
* For a block device, nvmet_ns_dev_disable() calls blkdev_put().
* The last blkdev_put() call calls disk_release().
* disk_release() calls blk_put_queue().
* The last blk_put_queue() call calls blk_release_queue().
* blk_release_queue() frees struct request_queue.
* blk_mq_complete_request_remote() dereferences req->q.
The analysis is correct, specifically for loop transport, but it is not
the same request_queue...
blk_mq_complete_request_remote references the initiator block device
created from the namespace, but nvmet_ns_dev_disable puts the backend
blockdev, which is a separate blockdev...
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point?
