On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:05:27AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 8/15/22 11:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> > > > > [ Upstream commit 88f1669019bd62b3009a3cebf772fbaaa21b9f38 ] > > > > For some technologies, e.g. an ATA bus, resuming can take multiple > > seconds. Waiting for resume to finish can cause a very noticeable delay. > > Hence this commit that restores the behavior from before "scsi: core: pm: > > Rely on the device driver core for async power management" for most SCSI > > devices. > > > > This commit introduces a behavior change: if the START command fails, do > > not consider this as a SCSI disk resume failure. > > > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215880 > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220630195703.10155-3-bvanassche@xxxxxxx > > Fixes: a19a93e4c6a9 ("scsi: core: pm: Rely on the device driver core for async power management") > > Hi Greg, > > It has been reported that this patch causes a regression, namely disks not > coming back after a resume. That issue is worse than the issue fixed by this > patch - eliminating a delay. Please drop this patch from the stable tree. > > A revert of this patch has been posted on the linux-scsi mailing list. See > also https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/8a83665a-1951-a326-f930-8fcbb0c4dd9a@xxxxxxxxxx/. Now dropped from the queue, thanks. greg k-h