Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/69] 5.15.59-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

On 01/08/22 06:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.59 release.
There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Aug 2022 11:41:16 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.59-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

## Build
* kernel: 5.15.59-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: f7c660e98f9bd2987c86dfe0017ad54afb4026e1
* git describe: v5.15.57-273-gf7c660e98f9b
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.57-273-gf7c660e98f9b

## No test regressions (compared to v5.15.58)

## No metric regressions (compared to v5.15.58)

## No test fixes (compared to v5.15.58)

## No metric fixes (compared to v5.15.58)

## Test result summary
total: 138438, pass: 122071, fail: 702, skip: 14903, xfail: 762

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 311 total, 308 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 68 total, 66 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 57 total, 51 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 50 total, 47 passed, 3 failed
* parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 59 total, 56 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 26 total, 23 passed, 3 failed
* sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 61 total, 59 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux