On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:16:00PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > Hi Greg, > > This backport series contains mostly fixes from v5.14 release along > with one fix deferred from the first joint 5.10/5.15 series [1]. > > The upstream commit f8d92a66e810 ("xfs: prevent UAF in > xfs_log_item_in_current_chkpt") was already applied to 5.15.y, but its > 5.10.y backport was more involved (required two non trivial dependency > patches), so it needed more time for review and testing. > > Per Darrick's recommendation, on top of the usual regression tests, > I also ran the "recoveryloop" tests group for an extended period of > time to test for rare regressions. > > Some recoveryloop tests were failing at rates less frequent than 1/100, > but no change in failure rate was observed between baseline (v5.10.131) > and the backport branch. > > There was one exceptional test, xfs/455, that was reporting data > corruptions after crash at very low rate - less frequent than 1/1000 > on both baseline and backport branch. > > It is hard to draw solid conclusions with such rare failures, but the > test was run >10,000 times on baseline and >20,000 times on backport > branch, so as far as our test coverage can attest, these backports are > not introducing any obvious xfs regressions to 5.10.y. Now queued up, thanks! greg k-h