On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 7/26/22 01:49, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022, Zenghui Yu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 2022/3/2 1:10, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > On 2/22/22 15:05, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > > From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 755c2bf878607dbddb1423df9abf16b82205896f ] > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > What prevented it to be accepted into 5.10-stable? It can still be > > > applied cleanly on top of linux-5.10.y. > > > > KVM opts out of the AUTOSEL logic and instead uses MANUALSEL. The basic idea is > > the same, use scripts/magic to determine what commits that _aren't_ tagged with an > > explicit "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" should be backported to stable trees, the > > difference being that MANUALSEL requires an explicit Acked-by from the maintainer. > > But as far as I understand it was not applied, and neither was "KVM: x86: > nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control > them". Ah, I misunderstood the question. I'll get out of the way.
