Re: [PATCH 4.9 1/1] security,selinux,smack: kill security_task_wait hook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:10AM +0200, Alexander Grund wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> after the previous discussion about what kind of patches are acceptable for stable
> and your hints on how to send them to the ML in https://lore.kernel.org/all/YsrfDfe3urGkepvJ@xxxxxxxxx/
> I'd like to know if this patch meets the requirements and if it can be considered.

Yes, it is now queued up.  It was delayed due to the RETBLEED mess.

> I do have a few more similar ones which I think meet the stable requirements
> and finally the init-cleanup patch
> (upstream 3dfc9b02864bt "LSM: Initialize security_hook_heads upon registration.")
> which I'd like to backport to 4.9. But first I want to know whether I now got
> the formal requirements right before sending further patches.

Let's see what the other patches look like, I can't guarantee anything
without reviewing them first.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux