Re: [PATCH dlm/next 3/3] fs: dlm: fix refcount handling for dlm_add_cb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 5:53 PM Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Each time dlm_add_cb() queues work or adds the lkb for queuing later to
> the ls->ls_cb_delay list it increments a refcount. However if the work
> is already queued or being added to the list we need to revert the
> incrementation of the refcount. The function dlm_add_cb() can be called
> multiple times without handling the related dlm_callback_work() work
> function where it's get a put call. This patch reverts the kref_get()
> when it's necessary in cases if already queued or not.
>
> In case of dlm_callback_resume() we need to ensure that the
> LSFL_CB_DELAY bit is cleared after all ls->ls_cb_delay lkbs are queued for
> work. As the ls->ls_cb_delay list handling is there for queuing work for
> later it should not be the case that a work was already queued, if so we
> drop a warning.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/dlm/ast.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/ast.c b/fs/dlm/ast.c
> index 0271796d36b1..68e09ed8234e 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/ast.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/ast.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ void dlm_add_cb(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, uint32_t flags, int mode, int status,
>  {
>         struct dlm_ls *ls = lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls;
>         uint64_t new_seq, prev_seq;
> +       bool queued = true;
>         int rv;
>
>         spin_lock(&dlm_cb_seq_spin);
> @@ -202,13 +203,19 @@ void dlm_add_cb(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, uint32_t flags, int mode, int status,
>
>                 mutex_lock(&ls->ls_cb_mutex);
>                 if (test_bit(LSFL_CB_DELAY, &ls->ls_flags)) {
> -                       if (list_empty(&lkb->lkb_cb_list))
> +                       if (list_empty(&lkb->lkb_cb_list)) {
>                                 list_add(&lkb->lkb_cb_list, &ls->ls_cb_delay);
> +                               queued = false;
> +                       }
>                 } else {
> -                       queue_work(ls->ls_callback_wq, &lkb->lkb_cb_work);
> +                       queued = !queue_work(ls->ls_callback_wq, &lkb->lkb_cb_work);
>                 }
>                 mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_cb_mutex);
> +
> +               if (queued)
> +                       dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
>         }
> +
>   out:
>         mutex_unlock(&lkb->lkb_cb_mutex);
>  }
> @@ -303,9 +310,7 @@ void dlm_callback_resume(struct dlm_ls *ls)
>  {
>         struct dlm_lkb *lkb, *safe;
>         int count = 0, sum = 0;
> -       bool empty;
> -
> -       clear_bit(LSFL_CB_DELAY, &ls->ls_flags);
> +       bool empty, queued;
>
>         if (!ls->ls_callback_wq)
>                 return;
> @@ -314,12 +319,16 @@ void dlm_callback_resume(struct dlm_ls *ls)
>         mutex_lock(&ls->ls_cb_mutex);
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(lkb, safe, &ls->ls_cb_delay, lkb_cb_list) {
>                 list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_cb_list);
> -               queue_work(ls->ls_callback_wq, &lkb->lkb_cb_work);
> +               queued = queue_work(ls->ls_callback_wq, &lkb->lkb_cb_work);
> +               WARN_ON_ONCE(!queued);

grml, that should be "!queue_work(ls->ls_callback_wq,
&lkb->lkb_cb_work);" and then "WARN_ON_ONCE(queued);" to follow the
same as above in dlm_add_cb(). Whereas queued is true as it is already
queued for work.

- Alex




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux