From: Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit be82abe6a76ba8e76f25312566182b0f13c4fbf9 ]
The kvm_riscv_check_vcpu_requests() is called with SRCU read lock held
and for KVM_REQ_SLEEP request it will block the VCPU without releasing
SRCU read lock. This causes KVM ioctls (such as KVM_IOEVENTFD) from
other VCPUs of the same Guest/VM to hang/deadlock if there is any
synchronize_srcu() or synchronize_srcu_expedited() in the path.
To fix the above in kvm_riscv_check_vcpu_requests(), we should do SRCU
read unlock before blocking the VCPU and do SRCU read lock after VCPU
wakeup.
Fixes: cce69aff689e ("RISC-V: KVM: Implement VCPU interrupts and requests handling")
Reported-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
index 7461f964d20a..3894777bfa87 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
@@ -673,9 +673,11 @@ static void kvm_riscv_check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (kvm_request_pending(vcpu)) {
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu)) {
+ kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_unlock(vcpu);
rcuwait_wait_event(wait,
(!vcpu->arch.power_off) && (!vcpu->arch.pause),
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock(vcpu);
if (vcpu->arch.power_off || vcpu->arch.pause) {
/*
--
2.35.1
