Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xtensa: add fixup for double exception raised in window" failed to apply to 3.15-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:50:07AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:10:29PM +0400, Max Filippov wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:57 AM,  <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.15-stable tree.
> > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> > 
> > On my side this patch applies clearly to the current v3.15.7.
> > Could this message be caused by anything else besides the
> > literal patch applicability (e.g. the patch size)?
> > 
> > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> > >
> > > From 17290231df16eeee5dfc198dbf5ee4b419996dcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 21:48:28 +0400
> > > Subject: [PATCH] xtensa: add fixup for double exception raised in window
> > >  overflow
> > >
> > > There are two FIXMEs in the double exception handler 'for the extremely
> > > unlikely case'. This case gets hit by gcc during kernel build once in
> > > a few hours, resulting in an unrecoverable exception condition.
> > >
> > > Provide missing fixup routine to handle this case. Double exception
> > > literals now need 8 more bytes, add them to the linker script.
> > >
> > > Also replace bbsi instructions with bbsi.l as we're branching depending
> > > on 8th and 7th LSB-based bits of exception address.
> > >
> > > This may be tested by adding the explicit DTLB invalidation to window
> > > overflow handlers, like the following:
> > >
> > >     --- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/vectors.S
> > >     +++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/vectors.S
> > >     @@ -592,6 +592,14 @@ ENDPROC(_WindowUnderflow4)
> > >      ENTRY_ALIGN64(_WindowOverflow8)
> 
> 
> Odds are patch is complaining about the diff in the changelog comment
> like this, I'll try it again after this round of kernels are released on
> Friday, thanks for looking at it.

Yes, that was it, it's now applied to the tree, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]