From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:51:56 -0700
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 09:36:32AM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 08:55:57 -0700
> > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 08:54:13AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 03:58:35PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > > > > From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > commit e445976537ad139162980bee015b7364e5b64fff upstream.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ayushman Dutta reported our 5.10 kernel hit the warning. It was because
> > > > > the original commit misses a Fixes tag and was not backported to the stable
> > > > > tree. The fix is merged in 5.16, so please backport it to 5.15 first.
> > > > >
> > > > > This ASSERT in xfs_rename is a) incorrect, because
> > > > > (RENAME_WHITEOUT|RENAME_NOREPLACE) is a valid combination, and
> > > > > b) unnecessary, because actual invalid flag combinations are already
> > > > > handled at the vfs level in do_renameat2() before we get called.
> > > > > So, remove it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Fixes: 7dcf5c3e4527 ("xfs: add RENAME_WHITEOUT support")
> > > > > Reported-by: Ayushman Dutta <ayudutta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Looks good to me, but you really ought to send 5.10 patches to the 5.10
> > > > XFS maintainer (Amir, now cc'd). (Yes, this is a recent change.) ;)
> > >
> > > ...and of course the first thing that happens is that I mix up the 5.10
> > > and 5.15 patches.
> > >
> > > Amir is the 5.10 maintainer, Leah is the 5.15 maintainer. Sorry about
> > > the mixup. /me pours himself a third(!) cup of coffee.
> >
> > Thank you for taking a look!
> >
> > And sorry that I'm not familiar with xfs workflow and didn't know each
> > version has dedicated maintainers.
>
> It's a recent change, because I wasn't keeping up with tending to six
> LTS trees /and/ upstream /and/ feature development.
It must have been really hard, that makes sense.
> > Is there a doc like Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst as both of
> > Amir and Leah seem not listed in the xfs entry of MAINTAINERS...?
>
> They're listed in MAINTAINERS in the 5.10 and 5.15 trees, respectively.
> That's also a very recent change (within the last week, I think).
Ah, I got it. I'm sorry it was because I used the latest get_maintainer.pl
only. I'll check each branch's MAINTAINERS next time.
Thank you!
