Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/29] 4.9.321-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 19:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.321 release.
> There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.321-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

NOTE:
while building arm and arm64 kernel Image the following warning noticed
on stable rc 4.19, 4.14 and 4.9 branches.

WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).

Build link:
https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2BIbqrrHp8Y7QNMu8Qt7AmNY72K/

## Build
* kernel: 4.9.321-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.9.y
* git commit: 32e4012394718d2eabab7e19b3c5787f5d3cd368
* git describe: v4.9.320-30-g32e401239471
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.320-30-g32e401239471

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.9.320)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.9.320)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.9.320)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.9.320)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 92818, pass: 81590, fail: 194, skip: 9916, xfail: 1118

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 255 total, 249 passed, 6 failed
* arm64: 51 total, 43 passed, 8 failed
* i386: 27 total, 23 passed, 4 failed
* mips: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 0 passed, 12 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 16 passed, 20 failed
* s390: 12 total, 9 passed, 3 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 44 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux