On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 19:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> ## Build * kernel: 5.18.9-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.18.y * git commit: 2c9a64b3a872fb2818d217509b16e61ba54c365e * git describe: v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872 ## Test Regressions (compared to v5.18.8) No test regressions found. ## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.18.8) No metric regressions found. ## Test Fixes (compared to v5.18.8) No test fixes found. ## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.18.8) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 120950, pass: 109794, fail: 546, skip: 9999, xfail: 611 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 307 total, 307 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 62 total, 62 passed, 0 failed * i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed * mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 56 total, 54 passed, 2 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
