On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:49:23 +0100 Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >.. which for me means a different patch 1, followed by patch 6 (moved > to be patch 2) would be ideal stable material. > > Then we have the current patch 2 which is open/unknown (to me at least). > > And the rest seem like optimisations which shouldn't be tagged as fixes. > > Apart from patch 5 which should be cc: stable, but no fixes as agreed. > > Could you please double check if what I am suggesting here is feasible > to implement and if it is just send those minimal patches out alone? Tested and porting just those 3 patches are enough to fix the Broadwell bug. So, I submitted a v2 of this series with just those. They all need to be backported to stable. I still think that other TLB patches are needed/desired upstream, but I'll submit them on a separate series. Let's fix the regression first ;-) Regards, Mauro
