On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:50:31 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 08:33:13AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:21:10 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > [ Upstream commit 1b205d948fbb06a7613d87dcea0ff5fd8a08ed91 ]
> > >
> > > This reverts commit 69135c572d1f84261a6de2a1268513a7e71753e2.
> > >
> > > This commit was just papering over the issue, ULP should not
> > > get ->update() called with its own sk_prot. Each ULP would
> > > need to add this check.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 69135c572d1f ("net/tls: fix tls_sk_proto_close executed repeatedly")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Mm? How did 69135c572d1f get into stableh?
> > I reverted it before it hit Linus's tree.
> > Don't see the notification about it either.
>
> It is commit 075/181 in this series as you can see here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627111946.738369250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Argh, I forgot I'm not gonna get CCed if my tags aren't on the
commit in question, sorry for the confusion.
So I expected patches 075 and 097 would just get dropped since
they are in the same series and are canceling each other out.
But I guess people may edit reverts so you prefer not to
automatically do that?
