From: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit b58cdd4388b1d8f5bee9f5a3897a7e780d1eaa48 ]
At the moment, if devm_of_phy_get() returns an error the serdes
simply isn't set. While it is bad to ignore an error in general, there
is a particular bug that network isn't working if the serdes driver is
compiled as a module. In that case, devm_of_phy_get() returns
-EDEFER_PROBE and the error is silently ignored.
The serdes is optional, it is not there if the port is using RGMII, in
which case devm_of_phy_get() returns -ENODEV. Rearrange the error
handling so that -ENODEV will be handled but other error codes will
abort the probing.
Fixes: d28d6d2e37d1 ("net: lan966x: add port module support")
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220525231239.1307298-1-michael@xxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index fee148bbf13e..b0cb3b65cd5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -948,8 +948,13 @@ static int lan966x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
lan966x->ports[p]->fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(portnp);
serdes = devm_of_phy_get(lan966x->dev, to_of_node(portnp), NULL);
- if (!IS_ERR(serdes))
- lan966x->ports[p]->serdes = serdes;
+ if (PTR_ERR(serdes) == -ENODEV)
+ serdes = NULL;
+ if (IS_ERR(serdes)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(serdes);
+ goto cleanup_ports;
+ }
+ lan966x->ports[p]->serdes = serdes;
lan966x_port_init(lan966x->ports[p]);
}
--
2.35.1
