Re: md/raid0: Ignore RAID0 layout if the second zone has only one device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 11:14:38AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Please apply
> Upstream commit ea23994edc4169bd90d7a9b5908c6ccefd82fa40
> to kernel versions 4.14, 4.19, 5.4 and above.
> 
> Reason:
> Commits c84a1372df929033cb1a0441fb57bd3932f39ac9 "md/raid0: avoid RAID0 data
> corruption due to layout confusion." and
> 33f2c35a54dfd75ad0e7e86918dcbe4de799a56c "md: add feature flag
> MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT" added handling of original and alternate layouts of
> RAID0 arrays with members of different sizes. However they introduced a
> regression: assembly of such RAID0 array fails if the per-array or default
> layout is not defined even when the layout is irrelevant and can be safely
> ignored. One common case is when the RAID0 array is composed of two members
> of different sizes because the disk or partition sizes are slightly
> different. This patch aims to fix this regression.
> 
> Newer versions of mdadm can set a per-array RAID0 layout but some stable
> distributions such as Debian 10 ship an older version of mdadm which does
> not handle RAID0 layouts and a kernel series (4.19.y) which now includes the
> backported commits. As a result, assembly fails after the kernel upgrade
> unless the default layout is defined with a kernel parameter.
> 
> Related Debian bug reports :
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944676
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954816

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux