Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 35/68] md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 35/68] md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 13:53:25 -0400
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Donald Buczek <buczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, agk@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f369ed06-d268-6fa9-f4aa-e9f5cd5ce53a@linux.dev>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 04:43:26PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:

Hi,
Pls drop this one from all stable kernel versions since it causedregression.


Will do, thanks.

--
Thanks,
Sasha

References:
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 01/68] iio: dummy: iio_simple_dummy: check the return value of kstrdup()
  - From: Sasha Levin
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 35/68] md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held
  - From: Sasha Levin
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 35/68] md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held
  - From: Guoqing Jiang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 21/38] accessiblity: speakup: Add missing misc_deregister in softsynth_probe
Next by Date: stable-rc/queue/5.10 baseline: 175 runs, 19 regressions (v5.10.120-563-g605674a2acb7f)
Previous by thread: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 35/68] md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held
Next by thread: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 32/68] kernfs: Separate kernfs_pr_cont_buf and rename_lock.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux