Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/667] 5.15.46-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 23:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.46 release.
> There are 667 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:48:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.46-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

## Build
* kernel: 5.15.46-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 53f46ca17ebdfbda0ddab0ba7aaad7c9b2493f02
* git describe: v5.15.45-668-g53f46ca17ebd
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.45-668-g53f46ca17ebd

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.43-213-g207ca688162d)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.43-213-g207ca688162d)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.43-213-g207ca688162d)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.43-213-g207ca688162d)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 135584, pass: 122903, fail: 248, skip: 11845, xfail: 588

## Build Summary
* arm: 17 total, 14 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 17 total, 12 passed, 5 failed
* mips: 4 total, 1 passed, 3 failed
* parisc: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 5 total, 2 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 5 total, 2 passed, 3 failed
* sh: 2 total, 0 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux