From: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
commit 60a60e32cf91169840abcb4a80f0b0df31708ba7 upstream.
This reverts commit a4efc174b382fcdb which introduced a regression issue
that when there're multiple processes allocating dma memory in parallel by
calling dma_alloc_coherent(), it may fail sometimes as follows:
Error log:
cma: cma_alloc: linux,cma: alloc failed, req-size: 148 pages, ret: -16
cma: number of available pages:
3@125+20@172+12@236+4@380+32@736+17@2287+23@2473+20@36076+99@40477+108@40852+44@41108+20@41196+108@41364+108@41620+
108@42900+108@43156+483@44061+1763@45341+1440@47712+20@49324+20@49388+5076@49452+2304@55040+35@58141+20@58220+20@58284+
7188@58348+84@66220+7276@66452+227@74525+6371@75549=> 33161 free of 81920 total pages
When issue happened, we saw there were still 33161 pages (129M) free CMA
memory and a lot available free slots for 148 pages in CMA bitmap that we
want to allocate.
When dumping memory info, we found that there was also ~342M normal
memory, but only 1352K CMA memory left in buddy system while a lot of
pageblocks were isolated.
Memory info log:
Normal free:351096kB min:30000kB low:37500kB high:45000kB reserved_highatomic:0KB
active_anon:98060kB inactive_anon:98948kB active_file:60864kB inactive_file:31776kB
unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB present:1048576kB managed:1018328kB mlocked:0kB
bounce:0kB free_pcp:220kB local_pcp:192kB free_cma:1352kB lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
Normal: 78*4kB (UECI) 1772*8kB (UMECI) 1335*16kB (UMECI) 360*32kB (UMECI) 65*64kB (UMCI)
36*128kB (UMECI) 16*256kB (UMCI) 6*512kB (EI) 8*1024kB (UEI) 4*2048kB (MI) 8*4096kB (EI)
8*8192kB (UI) 3*16384kB (EI) 8*32768kB (M) = 489288kB
The root cause of this issue is that since commit a4efc174b382 ("mm/cma.c:
remove redundant cma_mutex lock"), CMA supports concurrent memory
allocation. It's possible that the memory range process A trying to alloc
has already been isolated by the allocation of process B during memory
migration.
The problem here is that the memory range isolated during one allocation
by start_isolate_page_range() could be much bigger than the real size we
want to alloc due to the range is aligned to MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES.
Taking an ARMv7 platform with 1G memory as an example, when
MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES is big (e.g. 32M with max_order 14) and CMA memory is
relatively small (e.g. 128M), there're only 4 MAX_ORDER slot, then it's
very easy that all CMA memory may have already been isolated by other
processes when one trying to allocate memory using dma_alloc_coherent().
Since current CMA code will only scan one time of whole available CMA
memory, then dma_alloc_coherent() may easy fail due to contention with
other processes.
This patch simply falls back to the original method that using cma_mutex
to make alloc_contig_range() run sequentially to avoid the issue.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220509094551.3596244-1-aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220315144521.3810298-2-aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx/
Fixes: a4efc174b382 ("mm/cma.c: remove redundant cma_mutex lock")
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [5.11+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/cma.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
struct cma cma_areas[MAX_CMA_AREAS];
unsigned cma_area_count;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(cma_mutex);
phys_addr_t cma_get_base(const struct cma *cma)
{
@@ -471,9 +472,10 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma,
spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock);
pfn = cma->base_pfn + (bitmap_no << cma->order_per_bit);
+ mutex_lock(&cma_mutex);
ret = alloc_contig_range(pfn, pfn + count, MIGRATE_CMA,
GFP_KERNEL | (no_warn ? __GFP_NOWARN : 0));
-
+ mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex);
if (ret == 0) {
page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
break;
