From: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 7d54c15cb89a29a5f59e5ffc9ee62e6591769ef1 upstream.
We see the following GPF when register_ftrace_direct fails:
[ ] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \
0x200000000000010: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[...]
[ ] RIP: 0010:ftrace_find_rec_direct+0x53/0x70
[ ] Code: 48 c1 e0 03 48 03 42 08 48 8b 10 31 c0 48 85 d2 74 [...]
[ ] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000138bc10 EFLAGS: 00010206
[ ] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff813e0df0 RCX: 000000000000003b
[ ] RDX: 0200000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: ffffffff813e0df0
[ ] RBP: ffffffffa00a3000 R08: ffffffff81180ce0 R09: 0000000000000001
[ ] R10: ffffc9000138bc18 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff813e0df0
[ ] R13: ffffffff813e0df0 R14: ffff888171b56400 R15: 0000000000000000
[ ] FS: 00007fa9420c7780(0000) GS:ffff888ff6a00000(0000) knlGS:000000000
[ ] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ ] CR2: 000000000770d000 CR3: 0000000107d50003 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[ ] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ ] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ ] Call Trace:
[ ] <TASK>
[ ] register_ftrace_direct+0x54/0x290
[ ] ? render_sigset_t+0xa0/0xa0
[ ] bpf_trampoline_update+0x3f5/0x4a0
[ ] ? 0xffffffffa00a3000
[ ] bpf_trampoline_link_prog+0xa9/0x140
[ ] bpf_tracing_prog_attach+0x1dc/0x450
[ ] bpf_raw_tracepoint_open+0x9a/0x1e0
[ ] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[ ] ? lock_release+0x150/0x430
[ ] __sys_bpf+0xbd6/0x2700
[ ] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd8/0x130
[ ] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1c/0x20
[ ] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
[ ] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ ] RIP: 0033:0x7fa9421defa9
[ ] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 9 f8 [...]
[ ] RSP: 002b:00007ffed743bd78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
[ ] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000069d2480 RCX: 00007fa9421defa9
[ ] RDX: 0000000000000078 RSI: 00007ffed743bd80 RDI: 0000000000000011
[ ] RBP: 00007ffed743be00 R08: 0000000000bb7270 R09: 0000000000000000
[ ] R10: 00000000069da210 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
[ ] R13: 00007ffed743c4b0 R14: 00000000069d2480 R15: 0000000000000001
[ ] </TASK>
[ ] Modules linked in: klp_vm(OK)
[ ] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
One way to trigger this is:
1. load a livepatch that patches kernel function xxx;
2. run bpftrace -e 'kfunc:xxx {}', this will fail (expected for now);
3. repeat #2 => gpf.
This is because the entry is added to direct_functions, but not removed.
Fix this by remove the entry from direct_functions when
register_ftrace_direct fails.
Also remove the last trailing space from ftrace.c, so we don't have to
worry about it anymore.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220524170839.900849-1-song@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 763e34e74bb7 ("ftrace: Add register_ftrace_direct()")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -4427,7 +4427,7 @@ int ftrace_func_mapper_add_ip(struct ftr
* @ip: The instruction pointer address to remove the data from
*
* Returns the data if it is found, otherwise NULL.
- * Note, if the data pointer is used as the data itself, (see
+ * Note, if the data pointer is used as the data itself, (see
* ftrace_func_mapper_find_ip(), then the return value may be meaningless,
* if the data pointer was set to zero.
*/
@@ -5153,8 +5153,6 @@ int register_ftrace_direct(unsigned long
__add_hash_entry(direct_functions, entry);
ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(&direct_ops, ip, 0, 0);
- if (ret)
- remove_hash_entry(direct_functions, entry);
if (!ret && !(direct_ops.flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED)) {
ret = register_ftrace_function(&direct_ops);
@@ -5163,6 +5161,7 @@ int register_ftrace_direct(unsigned long
}
if (ret) {
+ remove_hash_entry(direct_functions, entry);
kfree(entry);
if (!direct->count) {
list_del_rcu(&direct->next);
