The patch below does not apply to the 3.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 92c14bd9477a20a83144f08c0ca25b0308bf0730 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:48:25 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume
This is only relevant to implementations with multiple clusters, where clusters
have separate clock lines but all CPUs within a cluster share it.
Consider a dual cluster platform with 2 cores per cluster. During suspend we
start hot unplugging CPUs in order 1 to 3. When CPU2 is removed, policy->kobj
would be moved to CPU3 and when CPU3 goes down we wouldn't free policy or its
kobj as we want to retain permissions/values/etc.
Now on resume, we will get CPU2 before CPU3 and will call __cpufreq_add_dev().
We will recover the old policy and update policy->cpu from 3 to 2 from
update_policy_cpu().
But the kobj is still tied to CPU3 and isn't moved to CPU2. We wouldn't create a
link for CPU2, but would try that for CPU3 while bringing it online. Which will
report errors as CPU3 already has kobj assigned to it.
This bug got introduced with commit 42f921a, which overlooked this scenario.
To fix this, lets move kobj to the new policy->cpu while bringing first CPU of a
cluster back. Also do a WARN_ON() if kobject_move failed, as we would reach here
only for the first CPU of a non-boot cluster. And we can't recover from this
situation, if kobject_move() fails.
Fixes: 42f921a6f10c (cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPUs which failed to come back after resume)
Cc: 3.13+ <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.13+
Reported-and-tested-by: Bu Yitian <ybu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 62259d27f03e..6f024852c6fb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1153,10 +1153,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
* the creation of a brand new one. So we need to perform this update
* by invoking update_policy_cpu().
*/
- if (recover_policy && cpu != policy->cpu)
+ if (recover_policy && cpu != policy->cpu) {
update_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
- else
+ WARN_ON(kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &dev->kobj));
+ } else {
policy->cpu = cpu;
+ }
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html