Hi Jason, On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:51:41AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:47 AM Phil Elwell <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for the quick response, but that doesn't work for me either. Let me say > > again that I'm on a downstream kernel (rpi-5.15.y) so this may not be a > > universal problem, but merging either of these fixing patches would be fatal for us. > > Alright, thanks. And I'm guessing you don't currently have a problem > *without* either of the fixing patches, because your device tree > doesn't use rng-seed. Is that right? > > In anycase, I sent in a revert to get all the static branch stuff out > of stable -- https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220607084005.666059-1-Jason@xxxxxxxxx/ > -- so the "urgency" of this should decrease and we can fix this as > normal during the 5.19 cycle. Since the above revert got queued in -stable, I assume you don't need commit 73e2d827a501 ("arm64: Initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt()") in stable either. Do you plan to fix the crng_ready() static branch differently? If you do, I'd like to revert the corresponding arm64 commit as well. It seems to be harmless but I'd rather not keep it if no longer needed. So please keep me updated whatever you decide. Thanks. -- Catalin
