On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:49 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:56:21AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > You can actually drop this in favor of > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220607084005.666059-1-Jason@xxxxxxxxx/ > > rather than playing whack-a-mole by architectures that may have been > > broken by it. > > So I need to drop this as well? Or is it ok to keep for now now that I > have queued up the other commit? The other commit ("Revert "random: use static branch for crng_ready()"") fixes this problem on all architectures. This commit fixes the problem on arm64. There's probably no harm in keeping this commit, if you want it, but it's also no longer necessary, because "Revert "random: use static branch for crng_ready()"" addresses the issue more comprehensively. Jason
