[PATCH 0/6] bfq: cgroup fixes for 5.10 stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [PATCH 0/6] bfq: cgroup fixes for 5.10 stable
From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 19:56:35 +0200
Cc: <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Hello,

In this series are BFQ upstream fixes that didn't apply to 5.10 stable tree
cleanly and needed some massaging before they apply. The result did pass
some cgroup testing with bfq and the backport is based on the one we have
in our SLES kernel so I'm reasonably confident things are fine.

								Honza

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] bfq: cgroup fixes for 5.10 stable
  - From: Greg KH
- [PATCH 6/6] block: fix bio_clone_blkg_association() to associate with proper blkcg_gq
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 1/6] bfq: Avoid merging queues with different parents
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 5/6] bfq: Make sure bfqg for which we are queueing requests is online
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 3/6] bfq: Remove pointless bfq_init_rq() calls
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 4/6] bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 2/6] bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair
  - From: Jan Kara

Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/6] bfq: Avoid merging queues with different parents
Next by Date: [PATCH 6/6] block: fix bio_clone_blkg_association() to associate with proper blkcg_gq
Previous by thread: stable-rc/queue/4.14 baseline: 121 runs, 21 regressions (v4.14.282-116-g2e365c3750555)
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/6] bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux