On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 03:02:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello Greg!
>
> I've seen this patch failed to apply to 4.19 and 4.14 stable trees but
> you've still merged (some) of the patches following this one from the same
> series. Honestly, I would not consider the result very trustworthy. The
> code involved is rather complex with subtle interactions across subsystems.
> So please remove also upstream commits:
>
> ea591cd4eb27 ("bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bio")
> fc84e1f941b9 ("bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair")
> 5f550ede5edf ("bfq: Remove pointless bfq_init_rq() calls")
> 09f871868080 ("bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online")
> 4e54a2493e58 ("bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage")
> 075a53b78b81 ("bfq: Make sure bfqg for which we are queueing requests is online")
>
> from 4.14 and 4.19 stable queues. If someone will need these fixes there,
> he'll need to do proper backport with targetted testing etc... Thanks!
Only 2 ended up applying there, so I've dropped those two now, thanks!
greg k-h
