The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.18-stable tree. I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst. I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From c56b3bf566da5a0dd3b58ad97a614b0928b06ebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20Sala=C3=BCn?= <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 18:08:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] selftests/landlock: Add tests for unknown access rights MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Make sure that trying to use unknown access rights returns an error. Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160820.524344-5-mic@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c index cc7fa7b17578..f293b7e2a1a7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c @@ -448,6 +448,22 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout1, file_access_rights) ASSERT_EQ(0, close(path_beneath.parent_fd)); } +TEST_F_FORK(layout1, unknown_access_rights) +{ + __u64 access_mask; + + for (access_mask = 1ULL << 63; access_mask != ACCESS_LAST; + access_mask >>= 1) { + struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_fs = access_mask, + }; + + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, + sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0)); + ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno); + } +} + static void add_path_beneath(struct __test_metadata *const _metadata, const int ruleset_fd, const __u64 allowed_access, const char *const path)
