Patch "tcp: Fix divide by zero when pushing during tcp-repair" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    tcp: Fix divide by zero when pushing during tcp-repair

to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     tcp-fix-divide-by-zero-when-pushing-during-tcp-repair.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From foo@baz Sat Jul 26 10:03:51 PDT 2014
From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 18:26:37 +0200
Subject: tcp: Fix divide by zero when pushing during tcp-repair

From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 5924f17a8a30c2ae18d034a86ee7581b34accef6 ]

When in repair-mode and TCP_RECV_QUEUE is set, we end up calling
tcp_push with mss_now being 0. If data is in the send-queue and
tcp_set_skb_tso_segs gets called, we crash because it will divide by
mss_now:

[  347.151939] divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP
[  347.152907] Modules linked in:
[  347.152907] CPU: 1 PID: 1123 Comm: packetdrill Not tainted 3.16.0-rc2 #4
[  347.152907] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
[  347.152907] task: f5b88540 ti: f3c82000 task.ti: f3c82000
[  347.152907] EIP: 0060:[<c1601359>] EFLAGS: 00210246 CPU: 1
[  347.152907] EIP is at tcp_set_skb_tso_segs+0x49/0xa0
[  347.152907] EAX: 00000b67 EBX: f5acd080 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
[  347.152907] ESI: f5a28f40 EDI: f3c88f00 EBP: f3c83d10 ESP: f3c83d00
[  347.152907]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
[  347.152907] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 083158b0 CR3: 35146000 CR4: 000006b0
[  347.152907] Stack:
[  347.152907]  c167f9d9 f5acd080 000005b4 00000002 f3c83d20 c16013e6 f3c88f00 f5acd080
[  347.152907]  f3c83da0 c1603b5a f3c83d38 c10a0188 00000000 00000000 f3c83d84 c10acc85
[  347.152907]  c1ad5ec0 00000000 00000000 c1ad679c 010003e0 00000000 00000000 f3c88fc8
[  347.152907] Call Trace:
[  347.152907]  [<c167f9d9>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0x2d/0x34
[  347.152907]  [<c16013e6>] tcp_init_tso_segs+0x36/0x50
[  347.152907]  [<c1603b5a>] tcp_write_xmit+0x7a/0xbf0
[  347.152907]  [<c10a0188>] ? up+0x28/0x40
[  347.152907]  [<c10acc85>] ? console_unlock+0x295/0x480
[  347.152907]  [<c10ad24f>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1ef/0x4b0
[  347.152907]  [<c1605716>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x36/0xd0
[  347.152907]  [<c15f4860>] tcp_push+0xf0/0x120
[  347.152907]  [<c15f7641>] tcp_sendmsg+0xf1/0xbf0
[  347.152907]  [<c116d920>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xf0/0x120
[  347.152907]  [<c106a682>] ? __sigqueue_free+0x32/0x40
[  347.152907]  [<c106a682>] ? __sigqueue_free+0x32/0x40
[  347.152907]  [<c114f0f0>] ? do_wp_page+0x3e0/0x850
[  347.152907]  [<c161c36a>] inet_sendmsg+0x4a/0xb0
[  347.152907]  [<c1150269>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x709/0xfb0
[  347.152907]  [<c15a006b>] sock_aio_write+0xbb/0xd0
[  347.152907]  [<c1180b79>] do_sync_write+0x69/0xa0
[  347.152907]  [<c1181023>] vfs_write+0x123/0x160
[  347.152907]  [<c1181d55>] SyS_write+0x55/0xb0
[  347.152907]  [<c167f0d8>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28

This can easily be reproduced with the following packetdrill-script (the
"magic" with netem, sk_pacing and limit_output_bytes is done to prevent
the kernel from pushing all segments, because hitting the limit without
doing this is not so easy with packetdrill):

0   socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0  setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0

+0  bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0  listen(3, 1) = 0

+0  < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1460>
+0  > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460>
+0.1  < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65000

+0  accept(3, ..., ...) = 4

// This forces that not all segments of the snd-queue will be pushed
+0 `tc qdisc add dev tun0 root netem delay 10ms`
+0 `sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_limit_output_bytes=2`
+0 setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, 47, [2], 4) = 0

+0 write(4,...,10000) = 10000
+0 write(4,...,10000) = 10000

// Set tcp-repair stuff, particularly TCP_RECV_QUEUE
+0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, 19, [1], 4) = 0
+0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, 20, [1], 4) = 0

// This now will make the write push the remaining segments
+0 setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, 47, [20000], 4) = 0
+0 `sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_limit_output_bytes=130000`

// Now we will crash
+0 write(4,...,1000) = 1000

This happens since ec3423257508 (tcp: fix retransmission in repair
mode). Prior to that, the call to tcp_push was prevented by a check for
tp->repair.

The patch fixes it, by adding the new goto-label out_nopush. When exiting
tcp_sendmsg and a push is not required, which is the case for tp->repair,
we go to this label.

When repairing and calling send() with TCP_RECV_QUEUE, the data is
actually put in the receive-queue. So, no push is required because no
data has been added to the send-queue.

Cc: Andrew Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: ec3423257508 (tcp: fix retransmission in repair mode)
Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ int tcp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, stru
 	if (unlikely(tp->repair)) {
 		if (tp->repair_queue == TCP_RECV_QUEUE) {
 			copied = tcp_send_rcvq(sk, msg, size);
-			goto out;
+			goto out_nopush;
 		}
 
 		err = -EINVAL;
@@ -1238,6 +1238,7 @@ wait_for_memory:
 out:
 	if (copied)
 		tcp_push(sk, flags, mss_now, tp->nonagle);
+out_nopush:
 	release_sock(sk);
 	return copied + copied_syn;
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from christoph.paasch@xxxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-3.10/tcp-fix-divide-by-zero-when-pushing-during-tcp-repair.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]