Patch for 5.10-stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Can we get this queued up for 5.10-stable? Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe
From b1da21187de121e2ed2dc2e0c70d5aabce469691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 06:05:27 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: always grab file table for deferred statx

Lee reports that there's a use-after-free of the process file table.
There's an assumption that we don't need the file table for some
variants of statx invocation, but that turns out to be false and we
end up with not grabbing a reference for the request even if the
deferred execution uses it.

Get rid of the REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE optimization for statx, and always
grab that reference.

This issues doesn't exist upstream since the native workers got
introduced with 5.12.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/YoOJ%2FT4QRKC+fAZE@xxxxxxxxxx/
Reported-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 4330603eae35..3ecf71151fb1 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4252,12 +4252,8 @@ static int io_statx(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock)
 	struct io_statx *ctx = &req->statx;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (force_nonblock) {
-		/* only need file table for an actual valid fd */
-		if (ctx->dfd == -1 || ctx->dfd == AT_FDCWD)
-			req->flags |= REQ_F_NO_FILE_TABLE;
+	if (force_nonblock)
 		return -EAGAIN;
-	}
 
 	ret = do_statx(ctx->dfd, ctx->filename, ctx->flags, ctx->mask,
 		       ctx->buffer);
-- 
2.35.1


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux