From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 16bbebd35629c93a8c68c6d8d28557e100bcee73 ]
ocelot_vcap_filter_del() works by moving the next filters over the
current one, and then deleting the last filter by calling vcap_entry_set()
with a del_filter which was specially created by memsetting its memory
to zeroes. vcap_entry_set() then programs this to the TCAM and action
RAM via the cache registers.
The problem is that vcap_entry_set() is a dispatch function which looks
at del_filter->block_id. But since del_filter is zeroized memory, the
block_id is 0, or otherwise said, VCAP_ES0. So practically, what we do
is delete the entry at the same TCAM index from VCAP ES0 instead of IS1
or IS2.
The code was not always like this. vcap_entry_set() used to simply be
is2_entry_set(), and then, the logic used to work.
Restore the functionality by populating the block_id of the del_filter
based on the VCAP block of the filter that we're deleting. This makes
vcap_entry_set() know what to do.
Fixes: 1397a2eb52e2 ("net: mscc: ocelot: create TCAM skeleton from tc filter chains")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
index d8c778ee6f1b..e47098900a69 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vcap.c
@@ -1181,7 +1181,11 @@ int ocelot_vcap_filter_del(struct ocelot *ocelot,
struct ocelot_vcap_filter del_filter;
int i, index;
+ /* Need to inherit the block_id so that vcap_entry_set()
+ * does not get confused and knows where to install it.
+ */
memset(&del_filter, 0, sizeof(del_filter));
+ del_filter.block_id = filter->block_id;
/* Gets index of the filter */
index = ocelot_vcap_block_get_filter_index(block, filter);
--
2.35.1
