3.8.13.27 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx>
commit ba15a58b179ed76a7e887177f2b06de12c58ec8f upstream.
>From the Bluetooth Core Specification 4.1 page 1958:
"if both devices have set the Authentication_Requirements parameter to
one of the MITM Protection Not Required options, authentication stage 1
shall function as if both devices set their IO capabilities to
DisplayOnly (e.g., Numeric comparison with automatic confirmation on
both devices)"
So far our implementation has done user confirmation for all just-works
cases regardless of the MITM requirements, however following the
specification to the word means that we should not be doing confirmation
when neither side has the MITM flag set.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index ba6f399..4d9e4b0 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -3573,8 +3573,11 @@ static void hci_user_confirm_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev,
/* If we're not the initiators request authorization to
* proceed from user space (mgmt_user_confirm with
- * confirm_hint set to 1). */
- if (!test_bit(HCI_CONN_AUTH_PEND, &conn->flags)) {
+ * confirm_hint set to 1). The exception is if neither
+ * side had MITM in which case we do auto-accept.
+ */
+ if (!test_bit(HCI_CONN_AUTH_PEND, &conn->flags) &&
+ (loc_mitm || rem_mitm)) {
BT_DBG("Confirming auto-accept as acceptor");
confirm_hint = 1;
goto confirm;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html