On 5/8/22 18:54, Kyle Huey wrote:
From: Kyle Huey <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 5eb849322d7f7ae9d5c587c7bc3b4f7c6872cd2f upstream
Zen renumbered some of the performance counters that correspond to the
well known events in perf_hw_id. This code in KVM was never updated for
that, so guest that attempt to use counters on Zen that correspond to the
pre-Zen perf_hw_id values will silently receive the wrong values.
This has been observed in the wild with rr[0] when running in Zen 3
guests. rr uses the retired conditional branch counter 00d1 which is
incorrectly recognized by KVM as PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND.
[0] https://rr-project.org/
Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-Id: <20220503050136.86298-1-khuey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Check guest family, not host. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Backport to 5.4: adjusted context]
Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
index 6bc656abbe66..3ccfd1abcbad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
@@ -44,6 +44,22 @@ static struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping amd_event_mapping[] = {
[7] = { 0xd1, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND },
};
+/* duplicated from amd_f17h_perfmon_event_map. */
+static struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping amd_f17h_event_mapping[] = {
+ [0] = { 0x76, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES },
+ [1] = { 0xc0, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS },
+ [2] = { 0x60, 0xff, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES },
+ [3] = { 0x64, 0x09, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES },
+ [4] = { 0xc2, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS },
+ [5] = { 0xc3, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES },
+ [6] = { 0x87, 0x02, PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND },
+ [7] = { 0x87, 0x01, PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND },
+};
+
+/* amd_pmc_perf_hw_id depends on these being the same size */
+static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(amd_event_mapping) ==
+ ARRAY_SIZE(amd_f17h_event_mapping));
+
static unsigned int get_msr_base(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, enum pmu_type type)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = pmu_to_vcpu(pmu);
@@ -130,17 +146,23 @@ static unsigned amd_find_arch_event(struct kvm_pmu *pmu,
u8 event_select,
u8 unit_mask)
{
+ struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping *event_mapping;
int i;
+ if (guest_cpuid_family(pmc->vcpu) >= 0x17)
+ event_mapping = amd_f17h_event_mapping;
+ else
+ event_mapping = amd_event_mapping;
+
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amd_event_mapping); i++)
- if (amd_event_mapping[i].eventsel == event_select
- && amd_event_mapping[i].unit_mask == unit_mask)
+ if (event_mapping[i].eventsel == event_select
+ && event_mapping[i].unit_mask == unit_mask)
break;
if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(amd_event_mapping))
return PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX;
- return amd_event_mapping[i].event_type;
+ return event_mapping[i].event_type;
}
/* return PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX as AMD doesn't have fixed events */
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Paolo
